Imam Abu Haneefa Rah Par Mushrik Honeka Ilzam Ki Wazahat

Imam Bukhari Rahimahullah Ne Imam Abu Haneefah Rah Par Ek Qaul Naqal Ki Hai Ke Imaam Azam Mushrik The!!! (Nauzu Billah)
Asal Haqeeqat Yeh Hai Ke Woh Qaul Imam Bukhari Rah Ka Nahi Jisko Ham Wazeh Karenge Insha Allah Aur Uski Sanad Me Bhi Kamzoori Yahan Tak Mauzu Hai Jo Darjeh Zail Tareekh Ul Kabeer Me Mazkoor Hai..

ﺳﻠﻴﻢ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭﺉ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻓﻲ ﺳﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ ﻭﺣﻤﺰﺓ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺕ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﺣﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﻭﺿﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻦ ﺻﺮﺩ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻲ ﺿﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻦ ﺻﺮﺩ ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﺳﻠﻴﻢ ﺳﻤﻊ ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻲ ﺣﻤﺎﺩ ﺑﻦ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺃﺑﻠﻎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺮﻙ ﺃﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﻱﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ
ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻣﺨﻠﻮﻕ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﻟﻰ ﻟﺒﻨﻲ ﺗﻴﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺛﻌﻠﺒﺔ ﺑﻦ ﺭﺑﻴﻌﺔ

Tarjuma-“Mazkura baala rivayat main Imam Abu Hanifa Rah ko
Mushrik kaha gaya hai. Baaz Ghair Muqallid ka israr hai keh Imam Bukhari Rah ne Imam Azam Rah ko (Mushrik) kaha hai..
(Ghair Muqallid Abu Jabar abdullah damanwi Ki Kitab Al-Deen al Khaalis- Qist 2, Safa 163)

Scan Page
Tarekh Ul-Kabeer

JAWAAB NO-1

Iske tardeedi jawab k liye khud Imam Bukhari Rah ka qaull he kafi hai jo unki Imam Abu Hanifa (Rd) se narazgi balke bughz-o-inaad ke ghalat Ta’sur ke (Khas-Maqsad) ke
tehet parchaar karne ki koshishon par pani pher deta hai.
Mulahiza ho!!

ﻗﺎﻝ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺃﺑﯽ ﺣﺎﺗﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﺍﻕ : ﺳﻤﻌﺘﮫ– ﯾﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ – ﯾﻘﻮﻝ : ﻻ ﯾﮑﻮﻥ ﻟﻲ ﺧﺼﻢُُ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ ، ﻓﻘﻠﺖُُ : ﺇﻥَّ ﺑﻌﺾَ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﯾﻨﻘِﻤُُﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﯿﮏ ﻓﻲ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﯾﺦ ﻭﯾﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ : ﻓﯿﻪ ﺍﻏﺘﯿﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ، ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :
ﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﺭﻭﯾﻨﺎ ﺫﻟﮏ ﺭﻭﺍﯾﺔً ﻟﻢ ﻧَﻘُُﻠﮫُُ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻨﺎ

Tarjuma-Muhamad bin abi hatim al waraq kehte hain ke mene Imam bukhari ko kehte huye suna ke Qayamat ke din mujhse jhagrah karne wala koi na hoga, to mene unse kaha, keh Baaz log Ap par
malamat karte hain keh apne apni tareekh ki kitabon main logon ki gheebat bayan ki hai… Imam Bukhari Rah ne jawab diya keh main ne apni
kitabon main mehez rivayat ko naqal kiya hai, apni taraf se kuch nahi likha hai”
(Sair al alam al nubula Liz Zehbi; Jild 12,Safa 441,Tab’at Mosisatal Risala beirut)

JAWAAB NO-2

Halanke Tarikh al Kabir main mazkora Imam Abu Hanifa Rah ke mutaliq qowl sanad ke sath Hamad bin abi Suleman se mansub hai…
Imam Abu Hanifa Rah ke naam ki sarahat ke sath is ko Imam Bukhari se bayan karne wala Zarar bin
sard hai….

Aur Zarar bin sard Se Yeh Qaul Zaef Jiddah Aur Jamhoor Ke Qaul Ke Khilaff Bhi Hai…

♥ Zarar Bin Sard Muhaddiseen Ke Nazar Me..

ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻳﺤﻴﻰ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ : ﻛﺬﺍﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻮﻓﺔ

Yahya bin Ma’en Rah kehte hain keh Kufa ka Kazzab hai..
(Meezanal aitidal jild, 2, no-3951, zarar bin sard)

Imam Nasai kehte hain ke “THIQA NAHI”.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺎﺑﻲ ﺗﺮﻛﻮ
Hussain bin muhammad alqababi kehte hain. Ke iss (zarar bin sard) ko TARK KARDIYA GAYA HAI‘.
(Tahzib ul Tahdhib jild 4, 798,zarar bin sard al taymi)

Hakim abu ahmed kehte hain ke Muhaditheen k nazdeek woh PUKHTA NAHI HAI..

Imam Darqutuni ne bhi isko zaeef qarar diya hai..

Ibn Qaney ne bhi isko Daeef kaha hai.

Imam Bukhari or Imam Nasai rah ne isko (Matrook al Hadith ) qarar diya hai…

Imam Tirmizi apni kitab “Jame al
Sunan al Tirmizi” main likhte hain ke
-”Main ne dekha ke Imam Bukhari, zarar bin sard ko Daeef qarar dete hain.”
(Kitab ul hajj; bab maa jaa’a fi fadhl al talbiyata wal nahr hd.no 828)

Jab Imam bukhari khud zarar bin sard ko (Matrook) Aur zaeef qarar dete hain toh yeh kis tarha kaha ja sakta hai keh Imam bukhari is ke
bayan karda qowl ko sahih tasleem karte hain??

JAWAAB NO-3

Is silsilay main ye baat bhi pesh e nazar rahe keh kuch maslak paraston ka Imam Abu Hanifa Rah k mutaliq jirah ke akhaz ka ye andaz Aima’e fann ke usoolon ke sareehan
khilaf hai…
Mulahiza ho!!

ﻗﻠﺖ : ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻻﻗﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺒﺄ ﺑﻪ ، ﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻻﺡ ﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻌﺪﺍﻭﺓ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻤﺬﻫﺐ ﺃﻭ ﻟﺤﺴﺪ ، ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺠﻮ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺼﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ، ﻭﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﺃﻥ ﻋﺼﺮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻋﺼﺎﺭ ﺳﻠﻢ ﺃﻫﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ، ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺪﻳﻘﻴﻦ ، ﻭﻟﻮ ﺷﺌﺖ ﻟﺴﺮﺩﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺮﺍﺭﻳﺲ

Tarjuma-Main (Imam Zahbi) kehta hun keh baaz hum asar Aima ki baaz ke mutaliq jirah wa qadha laiq e
tawaju nahi hoti , khususan jubkeh tum par wazeh hojai keh ye kalam ADAWAT,MAZHABI TA’SAB ya HASAD ki waja se waqiya huwa hai. Isse koi bhi mehfooz nahi raha
siwaye uske jise Allah ne bachaya, aur mere ilm ke mutabiq koi zamana aisa nahi aya jis main aimma isse bache hon , Siwaye Anbiya Aur
Siddiqeen ke aur agar main chahun toh inki Ek dusre se mutaliq is qisam ki baton se kitaben muratab kardun.
(Mezan al aitidal jild 1, 438,Ahmed bin abdullah al hafidh abu nuaim al asbahani)

ﻗُﻠْﺖُ: ﺍﺳْﺘَﻔِﻖْ، ﻭَﻳْﺤَﻚَ ! ﻭَﺳَﻞْ ﺭَﺑَّﻚَ ﺍﻟﻌَﺎﻓِﻴَﺔَ، ﻓَﻜَﻼَﻡُ ﺍﻷَﻗْﺮَﺍﻥِ ﺑَﻌْﻀُﻬُﻢ ﻓِﻲ ﺑَﻌْﺾٍ ﺃَﻣْﺮٌ ﻋَﺠِﻴْﺐٌ، ﻭَﻗَﻊَ ﻓِﻴْﻪِ ﺳَﺎﺩَﺓٌ – ﻓَﺮَﺣِﻢَ ﺍﻟﻠﻪُ ﺍﻟﺠَﻤِﻴْﻊ
َ
Tarjuma-“Main (Imam Zahbi)kehta hun keh tujhpar afsos,hosh main Aaa or apne Rab se aafiyat maang, kyu ke baaz HUM-ASR Aimma ka baz ke mutaliq kalam ajeeb o ghareeb
tarha ka hota hai. IS main bade-bade aimma mubtila huye hain, Allah sabpar Rahem farmaye”
(Siyar al alam al nubula, Jild 18, 13, al Buyuti yusuf abu yaqoob bin yahya al misri)

ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺴﻘﻼﻧﻲ : ﺇﻥ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﻗﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻝ ؛ ﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻻﺡ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻌﺪﺍﻭﺓ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻤﺬﻫﺐ ﺇﺫ ﻟﺤﺴﺪ ﻻﻳﻨﺠﻮ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺼﻤﻪ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ

Tarjuma-Imam Zahbi Aur Imam Ibn hajr Asqalani kehte hain keh baaz
ke mutaliq hum assar aima ke aqwal qabil e qabool nahi hote hain khususan jubke ayan ho keh ye aqwal inad, mazhabi tasub ya hasad ki bina par kahe gaye hon. Isse koi mehfoz nahi raha hai siwaye uske jise Allah ne bachaya…
(Jila ul Ayneen fi Mahakamatal Ahmed bin, Al-Alsui , Safa 32/33)

EK AITERAZZ…

Iss mauqah par yeh bhi wazeh kar
diya jaye ke is jirah wa qadah ya kalam se Ghair Muqallid abu jabar abdullah damanwi ke dawwe ke barkhilaf ahmed bin hanbal bhi nahi bacch sakte…

ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻜﻠﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺣﻤﺪﺗﺮﺟﻤﮧ :ﺍﺳﯽ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻧﮯ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻣﺎﻟﮏ ، ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺷﺎﻓﻌﯽ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ ﭘﺮ ﮐﻼﻡ ﮐﯿﺎ ﮨﮯ – ‏( ﺍﯾﻀﺎً ، ﺻﻔﺤﮧ ٣٢ )

Jabke Damanwi Rah likhte hain ke-“jabke mosoof ahmed bin hanbal ke mutaliq aisa lafz to kya kisi muhaddis ki mamooli jirah bhi nahi dikha sakte“
(Hawala: Al deen al khalis ,qist 2, safha 164)

Ghair Muqallid damanwi sahab ka ye dawa bhi guzishta dawo ki tarha bay
bunyad hai. kutub e asma ur rijal se maloom hota hai keh (al hasan bin ali bin yazid al karabeesi al fiqh al baghdadi)Sahib-al-Shafie ne Ahmeb bin hanbal par Ta’n or Kalam kiya
hai…
Jo Darje Zail Hai..

ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﻴﺐ : ﺣﺪﻳﺜﻪ ﻳﻌﺰ ﺟﺪﺍ ، ﻻﻥ ﺃﺣﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ ، ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺣﻤﺪ ، ﻓﺘﺠﻨﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺍﻻﺧﺬ ﻋﻨﻪ . ﻭﻟﻤﺎ ﺑﻠﻎ ﻳﺤﻴﻰ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺣﻤﺪ
ﻟﻌﻨﻪ ، ﻭﻗﺎﻝ : ﻣﺎ ﺃﺣﻮﺟﻪ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻀﺮﺏ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺳﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺑﻴﺴﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ / ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ : ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﺨﻠﻮﻕ ، ﻭﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﻠﻮﻕ ، ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﻨﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻔﻆ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺟﻴﺪ ، ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﺨﻠﻮﻗﺔ ، ﻭﺇﻥ ﻗﺼﺪ / ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻔﻮﻅ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻣﺨﻠﻮﻕ ، ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻯ ﺃﻧﻜﺮﻩ ﺃﺣﻤﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﻭﻋﺪﻭﻩ ﺗﺠﻬﻤﺎ ، ﻭﻣﻘﺖ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺣﺴﻴﻨﺎ ﻟﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺣﻤﺪ – ‏(ﻣﯿﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ، ﺟﻠﺪ ١ ، ٢٠٣٢ ، ﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ ﺑﻦ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺑﻴﺴﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻴﻪ / ﺗﮩﺬﯾﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﮩﺬﯾﺐ ، ﺟﻠﺪ ٢ ، ٦١٨ ، ﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﯽ ﺑﻦ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺑﻴﺴﯽ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩﯼ)

Hussain bin ali al karabesi Imam bukhari ki tarha Insani af’aal wa talafuz bil-quran ke qail thay. yeh ahmed bin hanbal k moaqif k khilaf tha, wo talafuz bil quran makhlooq
k masle main tashadud se kam lete thay. yahi waja hai keh dono ne ek dosre par taan kiya hai…

Ibne Abdul Brr likhte hain..

: ﻓَﻜَﺎﻥَ ﻛُﻞُّ ﻭَﺍﺣِﺪٍ ﻣِﻨْﻬُﻤَﺎ ﻳَﻄْﻌَﻦُ ﻋَﻠَﻰ ﺻَﺎﺣِﺒِﻬِﯿﻌﻨﯽ ﻭﮦ ﺩﻭﻧﻮﮞ ﺍﯾﮏ ﺩﻭﺳﺮﮮ ﭘﺮ ﻗﺪﺡ ﻭ ﻃﻌﻦ ﮐﯿﺎ ﮐﺮﺗﮯ ﺗﮭﮯ – ‏(ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻓﯽ ﻓﻀﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﮩﺎﺀ ، ﺻﻔﺤﮧ ١٦٥ ، ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﻟٰﯽ ١٤١٧ ﮪ ﺑﯿﺮﻭﺕ
– ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ)

Han ye or baat hai keh ahmed bin hanbal ke parastaron ne unke difah main koi daqeeqa faroguzasht nahi kiya, baaz unki shuhrat ya zahiri waza qata ke aseer huwe hain toh
baaz ne unke aqeeda wa nazriya ki himayat ka (HAQ) ada kiya hai… Hussain bin ali k (takalum fi ahmed) ki har mumkin tardded ki gayi hai..
Hussain bin ali al karabesi ke moqif ko sahih tasleem karne wale bhi Ahmed bin hanbal ke daam e fareb main giriftar huwe hain… Imam Zehbi Rah ne karabeesi ke moaqif ko haq batlane ke bawajood ahmed bin
hanbal ke sath wabastagi ka saboot diya hai…. Jo Inche Arbi Matan Me Warid Hai..

ﻭَﻻَ ﺭَﻳْﺐَ ﺃَﻥَّ ﻣَﺎ ﺍﺑْﺘَﺪَﻋَﻪُ ﺍﻟﻜَﺮَﺍﺑِﻴْﺴِﻲُّ ، ﻭَﺣَﺮَّﺭَﻩُ ﻓِﻲ ﻣَﺴْﺄَﻟَﺔِ ﺍﻟﺘَّﻠَﻔُّﻆِ ، ﻭَﺃَﻧَّﻪُ ﻣَﺨْﻠُﻮْﻕٌ ﻫُﻮَ ﺣَﻖٌّ– ‏(ﺳﯿﺮ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ، ﺟﻠﺪ ١٨ ، ٢٣ ،ﺍﻟﮑﺮﺍﺑﯿﺴﯽ ﺍﺑﻮ ﻋﻠﯽ ﺍﻟﺤﺴﯿﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﯽ ﺑﻦ ﯾﺰﯾﺪ )

Lehaza Jo Jirah Imam Ahmad, Imam Abu Haneefah Rah Aur Deegar Aimma Arba Pe Warid Huye Hain Woh Kisi Tassub Ya Zaef Ya Jhoote Sanad Se Warid Hain…

Allah Hamme Haq Aur Sacch Janneki Taufeeq Ata Kare..

Ameen…

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s